europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: static sparks

Subject: Re: static sparks
From: clevelee@cswebmail.com
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 15:47:42
Not to beat a dead horse . . .but. .

I found the Fuel systems article.  It was a CAFE foundation special report in
the March 2001 issue of Sport Aviation. (It was acting as a book mark in
Aircraft Spruce catlog).  It's good reading.

The wet rag trick must have come after that report.

Cleve


On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Fred Fillinger wrote:

> 
> clevelee@cswebmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > I was looking for my carefully misplaced article that was in Sport Aviation
> that
> > suggested the 1 meg resister, as part of an overall fuel system discussion.

 .
> > .and you're right about the shopping time to locate the 1 meg resistor.  Not
> > very common.
> > 
> > Cleve
> 
> I found it on my EAA CD-ROM - April, '87.  The author correctly states
> that discharge time will extend to several microseconds (1 us per pf
> of capacitance), but "probably below ignition temperature of gas
> fumes" is unsupported anywhere else I can find.  To the contrary,
> there's plenty of tech stuff at nasa.gov (as in Space Shuttle), and
> they're unhappy with > 10K ohms to control static discharge!
> 
> In fact, the many-megohm resistance of the human body, plus 200pf of
> capacitance, doesn't suppress the static sparks we experience, where
> it does indeed jump the gap before we make contact.  It is further the
> case that extending the discharge time can have little effect,
> provided the voltage is still sufficient to jump a gap and little is
> dissipated in the series resistor.  What ignites fuel vapor is Joules
> - volts-amps-time - however in combination derived and above the
> threshhold (.25 milliJoules I think).
> 
> I think practical considerations make it all moot.  In connecting a
> bonding or grounding wire to the airframe, such as the exhaust pipe,
> any spark there is harmless.  Or even before doing so, touching the
> filler cap to open it -- besides the resistor then not in the circuit
> -- any spark is also harmless since the cap is unvented.*  Since any
> charge has then been removed from the A/C, the only remaining hazard
> is the flow of fuel, and for that, very low resistance in
> bonding/grounding is required, as the literature is consistent in
> implying that 1 meg of series resistance there is potentially
> hazardous, if the flow rate is high enough.
> 
> *And -- on the older top-mount filler, ya didn't put the vents there,
> as I did not! 
> 
> Best,
> Fred F.
> The Europa Club website is at <<a
href="http://mail.cswebmail.com/jump/http://www.europaclub.org.uk>">http://www.europaclub.org.uk>;

The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
 Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
 http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>