europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Europa-List: Re: Woodcomp or Airmaster Prop

Subject: RE: Europa-List: Re: Woodcomp or Airmaster Prop
From: William Daniell <wdaniell.longport@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:40:10

Jerry

Thanks for the question.  I for one would appreciate an update - as and when
possible.  I am about (well within the next 12 months haha) to go through
the same decision.

Yours

Will

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of N6ZY
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 09:58
Subject: Europa-List: Re: Woodcomp or Airmaster Prop


Thanks to everyone who answered my original post, there was a lot of
information there.  My end conclusion was much as when I posted, that the
Woodcomp prop blades are really good, but the combination of poor quality
control and lack of US support makes the Airmaster a better bet for me.  I
dismissed the MT prop option as being expensive, and I know from previous
experience that MT are not always responsive and they are not troubled by
excessive humility!

So I phoned Martin at Airmaster yesterday and we discussed the options for
20 minutes.  He gets his blades from various suppliers, and basically agrees
that it would be much better if he had blades with more twist in them.  He
is looking into a number of options.  This includes using Whirlwind blades;
although they are a competitor, they are now willing to supply him.  Another
option is blades from either Helix or Neuform in Germany.  Finally he can
use any of the Sensenich blades.  He suggested that I phone the various
blade manufacturers to see what they have for my application.

The other question we discussed was the prop diameter.  I will fly 98% of
the time off hard runways, and cannot see that a 68" diameter prop would be
impractical even allowing for flat nosewheel tires (tyres?  I am a Brit
living in the US) and my bad landings.  That would open up the number of
blade options.  I know that Frans has increased his clearance using some
form of nose gear spacer, but I would rather keep it simple if I can.  In
addition using a 3 blade prop may make the use of smaller diameter blades
equivalent to larger 2 blades.

My end result is that I will delay the blade selection as long as possible,
but will go with the Airmaster prop, probably with 3 blades, and possibly
with Whirlwind blades.  They appear from their website to be well shaped
with adequate blade twist.

Any reactions to the use of a larger diameter prop would be appreciated.
Thanks again for the interest and inputs.

Jerry


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=402499#402499



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>