europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Europa-List: builder test flying his own creation?

Subject: Re: Europa-List: builder test flying his own creation?
From: Tom Friedland <96victor@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 19:15:05
Hi Niels

I am sorry to hear about your ground loop.  I don't understand your regrets
about doing your first flight.  Evidently that was ok and you had the loop
problem on a subsequent flight.  Is that correct?

If someone else had done the first flight and you flew afterward, would you
not have been just as likely to have the aircraft get away from you?

What am I missing here?

Tom Friedland, A 079, N96V


On 6/10/07, Niels Kock <nielskock@get2net.dk> wrote:
>
>
> Mike,
> It just proves that one cannot rely on one's own experience alone, but
> should benefit from those of others, before opening one's big mouth.
> The message is that what is true for some is not for others.
> regards,
> Niels
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mike Parkin" <mikenjulie.parkin@btopenworld.com>
> To: <europa-list@matronics.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 10:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Europa-List: builder test flying his own creation?
>
>
> > <mikenjulie.parkin@btopenworld.com>
> >
> > What I mean is that
> > 1. All Europas having been cleared by their inspectors will, almost per
> > definition, be
> >   well behaving when airborne.
> > 2. I seriously doubt that an eventual accompanying flying-instructor ca
n
> > prevent a ground
> >    loop if the builder has initiated one. The extra weight of the
> > instructor only increases the
> >    inertia.
> > 3. The ongoing horror stories about the proneness of the mono to
> > groundloop are, I feel, somewhat
> >     exaggerated, and, what is worse, they will unavoidably add to the
> > likely pre-take off apprehension
> >     of the builder. Which may increase his concentration, but as likely
> > will deteriorate his flying perfor-
> >     mance. And weeks or months of waiting for the availability of a
> > suitable test pilot serves
> >     only to increase the apprehension .
> > 4. Finally, one should not ignore the significance of the marvellous
> > moment where  you yourself take
> >     that blasted, expensive, beautiful toy, gestated, perhaps, in spite
> of
> > your wife's silent misgivings,
> >     aloft for the very first time. And,afterwards, having parked and
> shut
> > down the engine, can lean back,
> >     shut  your eyes and enjoy one of the rare moments in life, where yo
u
> > are truly in awe.
> >
> >
> > Niels,
> >
> > Just goes to show how wrong you can be.  You are not the first and you
> > will not be the last.  I didn't test fly my mono, but with a good
> measure
> > of overconfidence in a 20 knot crosswind, it bit me also.
> >
> > At least you are safe and just have the embarrassment of paying for a
> new
> > prop.
> >
> > How would you now modify your previous statements     --    repeated
> > above.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
> Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at f=E5 432 spam-mails.
> Betalende brugere f=E5r ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
> Hent gratis SPAMfighter her: http://www.spamfighter.com/lda
>
>
===========
===========
===========
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>