Hello Graham,
Don't doubt your own logic! Your explanation clarifies that element of the
debate up for me! Thank you for help.
Rob
Robert Hatton
email: roberthatton1@googlemail.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Graham
Singleton
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: Europa-List: Fuel return line attachment point with 912UL
<grahamsingleton@btinternet.com>
Robert Hatton wrote:
> Hello Graham,
>
> I am following this thread for I shall also be looking at fitting a fuel
> flow meter. Could I ask you to elaborate on your comment about ignoring
the
> return flow for you are only measuring the fuel to the engine. I think I
> understand that with the placement of the Flowscan (from Marcel's the
> schematic) no problem in measuring the fuel going to the engine. But with
> the fuel coming back via the return line will that not eventually (after
> going through the system) go back to the engine again via the Flowscan?
The
> question being, are the amounts so small not to worry about it and does
this
> just build in a safety margin? Sorry to sound thick on this, I am just
> trying to get my head around what has been said so far and the schematic.
>
>
> Robert
Hi Robert
I'm beginning to doubt my own logic on this thread :-\ but just think
about it for a moment. What we need to know is how much fuel the engine
uses/burns. All the rest of the fuel goes back to the tank. If you place
the Floscan, (I know of no other sensor that is acceptable) so that the
only fuel that passes through it is burnt by the engine then isn't that
what we want to know?
If fuel comes out of the tank and then goes back to the tank it hasn't
been used so won't be used to calculate fuel burnt by the totaliser.So
we don't need to know that, do we??
Graham
|