europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Europa-List: Tailplane retention

Subject: Re: Europa-List: Tailplane retention
From: Graham Singleton <grahamsingleton@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:13:50

Remember. Any holes drilled in the TP4 tube have to be horizontal. 
Vertical holes would weaken the tube too much.
Graham

glenn crowder wrote:
>   I like it.  I'm doing it this way rather than trying to improve the 
> TP6 bond!  Thats nuts!
>  
>                                               Glenn
> 
>  > Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:57:39 -0700
>  > Subject: Europa-List: Tailplane retention
>  > From: fklein@orcasonline.com
>  > To: europa-list@matronics.com
>  >
>  >
>  > Far be it for me, a humble late-builder, to chime in on this very
>  > technical discussion thread; nonetheless, in the spirit of "open source
>  > communication" with its underlying premise that an optimal solution to
>  > the problem will arise out of the clamor, I have a few thoughts to
>  > share. If I seem long-winded, my apologies, but clarity is my goal, as
>  > I've had difficulty understanding some of the posts of others whose
>  > brevity obscured (at least to me) some aspects of their intent.
>  >
>  > As I look at my "pre-glassed" tailplanes which came w/ my "accelerated"
>  > kit, the first thing I notice is that the pip pin recesses as supplied
>  > bear no resemblance to the drawings in the manual...at the skin
>  > surface, the recesses are round...about 1.25" diameter...and taper down
>  > to a .50" hemisphere in which is centered the hole for the pip pin. So
>  > I really have no assurance as to what extent the TP6 is properly bonded
>  > in or exactly what is going on...I ponder this while reading about
>  > variations (such as TP6 location) which others are discovering.
>  >
>  > As I review Mod 73 and digest the insightful posts regarding the
>  > process of accomplishing it, I can't escape my sense that...while it's
>  > doable and apparently (at least to those with both the hands-on
>  > building skills and technical knowledge to make such an assessment)
>  > solves the problem...the mod seems like a bit of a band aid solution.
>  > If I understand it correctly, it relies upon a proper bond between a
>  > small crescent of a portion of TP6 to some bid cloth which transfers
>  > any loads to the skin of the tailplane....I question whether I want to
>  > rely on that bond to resist impacts from normal (and sometimes not so
>  > normal) rigging.
>  >
>  > If the fundamental goal is to simply keep the TP12 pins fully engaged,
>  > I'm looking elsewhere from the pip pins.
>  >
>  > I'm looking at the tailplane root close out which, on my tailplanes,
>  > looks like about .088" of solid FG skin. I'm referring to the flanges
>  > which measure a full inch in width...from edge to innermost surface of
>  > the inboard plywood insert with the bushes which receive the TP12 pins.
>  >
>  > I liked Carl P.'s suggestion (as I understood it) of a hardened steel
>  > pin extending thru both top and bottom skins and lying inboard of the
>  > TP12 driveplate. The FG flange could be suitably reinforced...perhaps
>  > with an embedded plate which could be threaded to receive a threaded
>  > rod, thus eliminating fasteners extending beyond the plane of the
>  > tailplane surface. I did not understand Carl's calling for the rod to
>  > be 9" long, as the depth of the tailplane at the root is just under 5",
>  > but perhaps that was a typo. The beauty of Carl's suggestion is that it
>  > is simple and direct...it is completely visable anytime the tailplane
>  > is slid away from the fuselage an inch or so...and the condition of the
>  > "fix" can be monitored at any time in the future.
>  >
>  > Now that FG flange is only 1" wide, and the TP12 flanges measure 7/16",
>  > and the bushes sit 1/16" proud of the glassed plywood...so...after a
>  > (let's say) 1/4" dia. hole is drilled for a hardened steel pin to slide
>  > past the TP12 drive plate, there's only a 1/4" left of the flange. It
>  > would be sufficient however if the flange were reinforced with an
>  > embedded plate which would allow the forces to be transferred to both
>  > the top and bottom skins.
>  >
>  > The steel pin could be cut flush top and bottom; perhaps only the
>  > bottom plate would be threaded, and the top end of the pin could be
>  > slotted for a screwdriver so the pin could be turned in place (and
>  > perhaps loctite'd?). For redundancy, there could be two pins per side
>  > as Carl P. suggested for the faint of heart.
>  >
>  > With such a solution, the uncertainties of the conditions of the foam,
>  > flox, TP5 placement, and other issues around the pip pins become
>  > irrelevant.
>  >
>  > Amen...thanks for wading through this post.
>  >
>  > In the time it's taken me to write this, I may well have been able to
>  > install Mod 73...and...there's always been more than one way to skin a
>  > cat,
> &=========
>  >
>  >
>  >
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See what youre getting intobefore you go there. Check it out! 
> <http://newlivehotmail.com>
> 
> *
> 
> 
> *

-- 
Graham Singleton

Tel: +441629820187
Mob: +447739582005



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>