Pete, good on you, that actually sounds like a good option for UL Power,
I would have thought there is a big market for that weight break and
lower cost than Rotax. As you say, thermally the same, using the 350
parts on their proven base block, appears to be a relatively low risk
venture. We live in hope.
Cheers,
Brian Phillips.
On 12/11/2022 9:57 pm, Pete wrote:
>
> Re ULPower, following for years. Appears to be solid. Have been trying to
> convince
them for years now to offer a turbod low compression 260 @ 130hp, as thermally
a no brainer, as it has the same heads and bottom end (just shorter stroke)
as their 130hp 350, but alas they don't see a market. I keep telling them
they would supplant the 914 market, and steal from the 915 for those airframes
who are weight limited (as the europa), being simpler and lighter etc. instead
they are chasing the larger lycoming market with their turbo 6cyl.
>
> *sniff*
>
> Cheers,
> PeteZ
>
>> On Nov 12, 2022, at 2:12 AM, Area-51<goldsteinindustrial@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Agree with Pete regarding accumulated hours v's reliability; only time in the
sky will definitively answer that one.
>>
>> What about UL Power? Has anybody user feedback on these? They seem like
>> everything
a Jabiru is trying to be???
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Read this topic online here:
>>
>> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=508738#508738
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
|