europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Europa-List: Re: What did you do with your Europa this week - 08/11/

Subject: Re: Europa-List: Re: What did you do with your Europa this week - 08/11/22
From: Pete <peterz@zutrasoft.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 06:30:25
My experience conversing with Edge=99s principal over the years, fwiw,
 is that he is chock full of confidence, many good ideas but peppered with s
ome critical bad ones -which he will not acknowledge, and lets his customers
 =9Cprove him wrong=9D. And some have (ex: cracked/failed welded
 crank). Too few accumulated hours to tease out all that pepper.

Same syndrome as Jan at viking (although Jan even lacks the engineering basi
cs).

Difficult to watch.

Cheers,
PeteZ

> On Nov 11, 2022, at 6:13 AM, Brian Phillips <barp99@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> =EF=BB Bud, thanks very much for your well laid out advice below, much a
ppreciated, your background knowledge never ceases to amaze me.  
> 
> You have talked me out of the 915, the thought of doing all the retrofit w
ork, along with the  weight issues, its just not worth it, and I would never
 finish it. I am still interested in the 912Is, & was thinking about the Edg
e 1484cc big bore kit. Your comments below about some of the US based big bo
re kits has got me thinking again. 10.5:1 CR does seem a little high, combin
ed with no detonation detection feedback loop, does sound a bit risky. Edge p
erformance don't play with the Rotax FI software, they supply a fuel pressur
e reg that increases the rail pressure, so the pump/s are working harder, ag
ain an added risk. Add to that limited operational history, makes the 914 lo
ok an even better outcome. As you say, 20,000 compromises flying in close fo
rmation. 
> 
> Cheers,
> Brian Phillips. 
> 
>> On 11/11/2022 4:34 am, Bud Yerly wrote:
>> Pete, as you are most aware and Brian you are learning fast:
>> Weight is the enemy of an airplane.  Especially the Europa, as it is a ve
ry compact aircraft.  If I add 15 horsepower, but it moves the CG forward, r
equires a prop extension and a constant speed prop, the CG is going to be so
mewhere around the spinner.  Now we move the battery back, run longer heavie
r cables and as much more to the rear as possible such as autopilots, ELTs, e
tc. to counterbalance the nose. The weight just keeps going up.  The Europa X
S is 100 pounds heavier than the equivalent Europa Classic even with the XS f
uselage module and firewall forward.  The 912 80 HP is not a spectacular per
former but will give 30 ANMPG at low altitude or with a leaning device at al
titudes up to about 10,000 feet. Cruise is in the 120-130 knot range.  The 9
12S raised the cruise about 5 knots more.  The 914 doubles the climb rate, u
ps cruise to at least 140-145 knot range at the same 25 ANMPG as the 912S on
 a tricycle gear aircraft of course.  The mono is faster and lighter of cour
se. 
>>  
>> As I learned on modifying the 914 to fuel injection.  Customers moved the
 boost up to get more power but complained it burned more fuel.  The only ad
vantage was more power with less reliability.  Fuel burn was basically the s
ame at 31 inches and 5000 RPM.  So, what did I gain?  Slightly more power fo
r climb but more heat to dissipate, a bigger radiator and shallow climb was n
ecessary to cool.  BTU requirements are the same for the same amount of powe
r at the same fuel air ratio and varies little with displacement.  Aircraft e
ngines run at constant RPMs like a marine engines, so a carb is just as good
 as fuel injection except for altitude performance of a normally aspirated e
ngine with no leaning.  The Bing stops leaning after about 3500 feet in the n
ormally aspirated engine.  So, an after market leaning system is necessary f
or the high altitude flyers to improve fuel efficiency of the 912/912S.  The
 Rotax 914 is ideal for higher altitude operations and frankly ideal for the
 Europa but at a higher cost. I believe the 914 totally transformed the Euro
pa into a great airplane. Reliability of the 914 is now as good as the 912S b
ut as we all know, there are techniques and inspections required to keep it r
unning like new.
>>  
>> Normally a 912 through the 914 will go 1000 hours with only carb maintena
nce/oil changes.  Overspeed of the engine is an issue many ignore.  The valv
es can and do contact the piston if oversped.  Prop strikes are ignored also
 by many STOL operators and taildragger/mono.
>> I do a top overhaul at about 500-600 hours (gearbox, clean up the valves,
 inspect the rings/cylinders) and press on.  Repeat at 1000 hours and the en
gine is good to 1500 hours.  The cleanup of the valves restores compression t
o like new or better than new and is really a surprise when a 914 burps afte
r only about 5 blades of rotation.
>>  
>> I have no experience with the latest Edge Performance engines, but I do w
ith the so called "Big Bore" engines done here in the States some years ago.
  They do put out more power.  But for how long?  Over the years the stock R
otax 100 HP 912S (especially the new blocks) last and last.  Most of the Big
 Bores were back in after as short as 200 hours.  But we have many cowboys h
ere in the States that just want more power but won't pay for it to get powe
r and reliability.  I was around for the first of these Big Bore mods.  As E
dge Performance has found out, the crank shaft, and many other formally robu
st Rotax parts are now under more stress and required "upgrade".  This costs
 money.  My hats off to them, as they have at least backed their engines.  I
n their defense, some of our =9Ccowboys=9D here in the States ar
e running regular car fuel.  This causes detonation for sure. I can=99
t fix stupid!
>>  
>> If you need more power keep in mind in general you will need more gas, ga
in weight, reduce reliability, increase inspection requirements, require gre
ater cooling mass, and of course add cost.  An airplane is 20,000 compromise
s flying in close formation.  If you change one thing, you affect 20 others.
  Choose wisely. 
>>  
>> Example:  Charts are scare still for the 915.
>> 5000 RPM wide open throttle 87 KW or about 115 HP (10-20 more than the 91
4 depending on MP and TCU.) Fuel flow 27 L/hr or 7.1GPH. 
>> A 20 HP increase on N12AY (Trigear) yields a cruise speed increase of nea
rly 10-13 Kts above 10,000 feet which is better than most. 
>> However, the range in Air Nautical Mile per Gallon does not increase it d
ecreases from about 25 ANMPG to 20 ANMPG. 
>>  
>> The Europa drag goes up beyond 140 Knots by a cube root for the trigear. 
 The mono is much better at still basically a square root curve.  More horse
power doesn=99t give me impressive efficiency or speed.
>>  
>> The 914 fits easily in the Europa XS, will cool, accepts a constant speed
 prop without issue or added extensions, has a reasonable fuel burn and will
 get you to 10,000 feet in about 11-13 minutes in a cruise climb.  I can put
 out 70 to 95 horsepower continuous for cruise (typically 140-145 for a trig
ear) or max speed.  Both the 912S/iS and Big Bore require the same octane fu
el as the 914 so no advantage.  The 914 turbo takes care of most of the issu
es with density altitude, it allows the Bing to work ideally from cruise to m
ax continuous from the surface to service ceiling (which is well above 25,00
0 which is our human physiological limit without cabin pressurization).  We k
now how to maintain it, the TCU has been modified and I can setup, troublesh
oot or simply run a data dump from my laptop running Windows 7 through 10 wi
thout a special dongle.  I don=99t have Windows 11 yet, but it should w
ork also.  Carbs are easy to balance, and the installation manual is easy to
 follow.  Always follow the engine installation manual in conjunction with t
he airframe firewall forward manual .
>>  
>> The 915 was never designed to fit a standard Rotax engine mount and does n
ot fit most experimental aircraft firewall forwards.  Extensive work is nece
ssary to retrofit the 915 to a 912/914 airframe.  The 915 is unmaintainable b
ut for plugs and oil change without a =9Cbuds=9D system for the a
verage owner to tell you what it=99s doing but the troubleshooting man
ual is a bit sparce.  Much study and patience is needed as the 915 goes thro
ugh its teething issues.  It runs lean on the ground like the 912iS and will
 overheat easily during an extended taxi out.  Automatic systems means you t
he pilot lose control.  Many 912iS owners hate the power drop off and find e
conomy only comes through lower power.  They have found fuel burn is the sam
e for the same speed after an engine change from the S to the iS.  The 915 h
as a similar issue with the power requirements.  It is not like hopping into
 your BMW tubo and everything works.  It is still like the 1980=99s fi
rst gen fuel injection and turbo mods.  Today it all works flawlessly in our
 autos, but with larger cooling requirements and components taking up more s
pace under the hood.  The 915 is not quite a plug and play engine electrical
ly either.  Look at Sling and their learning curve.  The 4 place needs 140-1
50 HP.  The two place not so much.  Guys are looking hard at the difference.

>>  
>> In summary, the Europa was designed for about 100HP engines of light weig
ht.  It is fast and efficient for a 100HP 500 pound payload airplane.  More w
eight makes the induced drag go up.  The mono airframe was not designed to g
o faster than about 170 KTAS at 20,000 feet at an empty weight of 900 pounds
.  If you go above 900 pounds empty weight, the plane gets sluggish, speed d
rops and range is decreased.  In the States, a 1000 mile per day range airpl
ane is essential for getting around west of the Mississippi river. For my sn
ow birds coming from Canada to Florida for the winter, they need that range a
lso.  Frankly, a bigger engine makes for shorter hops, less payload, and a l
onger day.   More horsepower is not as important as more torque.  Torque tur
ns the prop, HP just makes it spin up faster.
>>  
>> Keep it light, keep it simple, and it will be a trouble-free steed with s
tock components.  Work on drag reduction and keeping the weight down.  Not b
y slapping more horsepower, weight, complexity, and cost on a very small air
frame. 
>>  
>> Just my thoughts.
>>  
>> Best Regards,
>> Bud Yerly
>>  
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com <owner-europa-list-server@ma
tronics.com> On Behalf Of Pete
>> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 6:59 AM
>> To: europa-list@matronics.com
>> Subject: Re: Europa-List: Re: What did you do with your Europa this week -
 08/11/22
>>  
>>  
>> .except for the concerns of Edge welded cranks (cracking), and s
ingle point of failure (FI).
>> Cheers,
>> PeteZ
>>  
>>  
>> > On Nov 10, 2022, at 1:58 AM, Area-51 <goldsteinindustrial@gmail.com> wr
ote:
>> >
ial@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Brian the Edge Performance engines are worth looking at if forward mass
 is a concern... the Gen4 6cyl Jabiru is said to finally be showing reliabil
ity but i would still choose Edge over Jabiru
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Read this topic online here:
>> >
>> > https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fforu
ms.matronics.com%2Fviewtopic.php%3Fp%3D508643%23508643&amp;data=05%7C01%7C
%7C95fbe6d1f864429d6f9408dac3137511%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7
C0%7C638036785611267994%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoi
V2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=DmjfwqvqQ
BLFoORotf%2FyaLw%2FmFIOZbrmrQPIcMlLUf4%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>  
>>           - The Europa-List Email Forum -
>>    --> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
Fwww.matronics.com%2FNavigator%3FEuropa-List&amp;data=05%7C01%7C%7C95fbe6d
1f864429d6f9408dac3137511%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C63803
6785611267994%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLC
JBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=wm%2FStj0pmmpyz3Mig
2LnRkBfFdsMx6SLnhjzkK37%2Bc0%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>                - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
>>    --> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
Fforums.matronics.com%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7C%7C95fbe6d1f864429d6f9408dac31
37511%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638036785611267994%7CUnkn
own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC
I6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=ycdDH2pLsucuLwZ1D%2BRcZsnydcBK5AXdQ6ZEj
p%2FjBDQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>               - NEW MATRONICS LIST WIKI -
>>    --> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
Fwiki.matronics.com%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7C%7C95fbe6d1f864429d6f9408dac3137
511%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638036785611267994%7CUnknow
n%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6
Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=H82eUxCpMT3FC%2B47WY13DthUPxRlKcO8Slvw4b4
BIv4%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>              - List Contribution Web Site -
>>   Thank you for your generous support!
>>                               -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
>>    --> https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
2Fmatronics.com%2Fcontribution&amp;data=05%7C01%7C%7C95fbe6d1f864429d6f940
8dac3137511%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638036785611267994%
7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwi
LCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=%2BJyIGhvIq4pT7mzs62M9oV5AvbuxUVm
XHUlH%2FDEvC%2Bg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>  
>>  
>>  
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>