Bob,
You are right on the money. Every aircraft I have built needed about
1/8 off each clevis on the pitch mechanism to allow the trim bar to
clear at full elevator and trim travel. As for interpreting the English
Language.... No comment.
Regards,
Bud Yerly
----- Original Message -----
From: Fred Klein<mailto:fklein@orcasonline.com>
To: europa-list@matronics.com<mailto:europa-list@matronics.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 10:30 AM
Subject: Europa-List: Re: Clevice \Forks debacle.........
Bob=85thank you for your attention to my build photo and for alerting
me to this issue, however vexing you may find it.
I am simply baffled to learn that you find =93there is already enough
shit flying about on the issue=94 and that it=92s an example showing
that =93people just can=92t read and interpret the English
language=94=85please do not attempt to elaborate=85I can do without
further discussion which you find unsuitable for posting on Matronics.
Fred
On May 22, 2014, at 2:19 AM, Bob Harrison
<ptag.dev@talktalk.net<mailto:ptag.dev@talktalk.net>> wrote:
Hi! Tony /Fred.
To try to help you over this vexed issue concerning the clevis forks
I just spoke to a local friend on the issue ....his immediate response
was that he had removed =BC=94 but when I questioned him further he
started to apply some engineering reason to the issue and suggested that
we probably both removed 1/8=94 from each clevice to ensure there was
adequate thread purchase left on both clevices. Which is the principle I
would apply , the only thing better is to remove it from one and check
the operational clearance as to whether it is necessary to do the other
too.
I=92m not publishing this on the Matronics site since there is
already enough shit flying about on the issue , people just can=92t read
and interpret the English language !
Regards
Bob H
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List<http://www.matronics.com/N
avigator?Europa-List>
http://www.matronics.com/contribution<http://www.matronics.com/contributi
on>
|