europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914

Subject: RE: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914
From: Karl Heindl <kheindl@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 12:56:30

Ian=2C
I was confused. I thought I had the A model=2C as you suggested=2C but it i
s actually a B. Perhaps that is why I couldn't get it to work by using just
 the one plus a pulsation damper=2C as John Wigney had done successfully.I 
will now get another B for the return line. Or would an A be compatible ?Th
e FS450 installation manual only mentions the part numbers for models B and
 C. The price is the same for all 3. The manual also warns about using alum
inum fittings.
Cheers=2C
Karl


From: g-iani@ntlworld.com
Subject: RE: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a  
 914
Date: Mon=2C 2 May 2011 10:57:56 +0100


Karl and Jan I am quoting what I have been told by both Grand Rapids and Pa
rt for Aircraft.  I am waiting for an MGL FF1 (with the FT60 sensors) to go
 into the repair of G-IRON. The 201B (and 201C) are capable of higher flow 
rates with slightly reduced resolution but=2C I believe=2C are still accept
able to the LAA .  The Marine versions are probably also acceptable=2C cost
 less  but are heavier.  Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear=2C 300hours
Europa Club Mods Specialist
e-mail g-iani@ntlworld.com  


                                          


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>