Subject: | RE: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914 |
---|---|
From: | G-IANI <giani@ntlworld.com> |
Date: | Mon, 2 May 2011 10:57:56 |
Karl and Jan I am quoting what I have been told by both Grand Rapids and Part for Aircraft. I am waiting for an MGL FF1 (with the FT60 sensors) to go into the repair of G-IRON. The 201B (and 201C) are capable of higher flow rates with slightly reduced resolution but, I believe, are still acceptable to the LAA . The Marine versions are probably also acceptable, cost less but are heavier. Ian Rickard G-IANI XS Trigear, 300hours Europa Club Mods Specialist e-mail g-iani@ntlworld.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914, GRAHAM SINGLETON |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914, Karl Heindl |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914, GRAHAM SINGLETON |
Next by Thread: | RE: Europa-List: Best device to ratify the Actual Fuel Flow on a 914, Karl Heindl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |