Floscan is the best transducer, it uses an infra red sensor so is not =0Asu
sceptible to magnetic interference. Unlikely to block, the hole is larger t
han =0Aanything that would get throuhg your filter. Look for it on marine o
r automotive =0Amarkets. Non certified units are the same but cheaper. My G
rand Rapids monitor =0Auses the Floscan and the do sell them separately.=0A
Graham=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: "peter.rees01
@tiscali.co.uk" <peter.rees01@tiscali.co.uk>=0ATo: europa-list@matronics.co
m=0ASent: Thursday, 21 October, 2010 10:14:43=0ASubject: Re: Europa-List: R
s01@tiscali.co.uk" =0A<peter.rees01@tiscali.co.uk>=0A=0ACould be wrong but
I don't think that the LAA allow the RS fuel flow =0Asensor to be used beca
use of the danger of blockage. I think that the =0AFlowscan units are the s
uggested route (I think that Parts for Aircraft =0Ais a good UK source - ch
eaper in the US if you can be bothered to save =0Aa few quid) - quite a bit
more money than the RS unit but not as much =0Aas putting the aeroplane do
wn in a field.=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A----Original Message----=0A=0AFrom: g
raeme@gdbmk.co.uk=0A=0ADate: 21/10/2010 9:36 =0A=0ATo: <europa-list@matroni
cs.com>=0A=0ASubj: Europa-List: Rotax fuel flow detection=0A=0A=0A=0A--> Eu
ropa-List message posted by: "graeme bird" <graeme@gdbmk.co.uk>=0A=0A=0A=0A
Just sorting the fuel system on my new build. I am considering =0Aincluding
an RS type flow sensor for future use but what confuses me on =0Athe 912 i
nstall is that some of the fuel comes back which would make =0Athe reading
useless unless a return sensor was also fitted. This is the =0Areason my fu
el calculator in my C42 is worse than useless. Any advice =0Aappreciated.
=0A=0A=0A=0A--------=0A=0AGraeme Bird=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ARead thi
s topic online here:=0A=0A=0Ahttp://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=
|