europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Europa-List: 914 Fuel Injected Update & Opinion

Subject: RE: Europa-List: 914 Fuel Injected Update & Opinion
From: craig bastin <craigb@onthenet.com.au>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:06:57
Gee a very detailed response indeed. With regard to the prop issues, maybe
have a look at the new Bolly VP prop
the testing they have done was up to 160hp at 30 degrees of pitch, the
series 5 props could also suit.
I have emailed them about a release date but they are yet to reply

craig
  -----Original Message-----
  From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of ALAN YERLY
  Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2009 1:42 PM
  To: europa-list@matronics.com
  Subject: Re: Europa-List: 914 Fuel Injected Update & Opinion


  Craig,
  Not for aircraft.  Just the auto gyro which is running at normal 5-7 gph
depending on throttle setting.  What we high speed aircraft are looking for,
is savings at altitude where the Bing really doesn't hack it.  Low altitude
won't be that much of a difference.  As we see in autos, the fuel flows for
a fuel injected engine are slightly lower than the same engine in its carbed
version.  My biggest concern is getting a prop to absorb the extra power.
If you crank the boost down to 3-4 psi (40 inches of MP) verses 5 psi (55
inches), no problem.  Crank the boost up and the gas goes out the back and
the prop must be cranked to a very high pitch to absorb the power, which
cuts efficiency.  With the Europa limited to 64 inches of prop (66 max, but
watch that nose pant), even the Airmaster will be maxed out trying to absorb
the power.

  Personally, a Europa at 34 inches of boost is pretty economical (from
normal Rotax 914 experience).  Right now the guys using the Jason Parker
engine are low and slow types (Just Aircraft, Auto Gyro, Titan Tornado,
Kitfox) so they don't care because their airframe is so draggy, they want
takeoff power for high field elevations and mountain crossing ability.  Most
of us want the cruise performance and low maintenance.

  I am looking for the typical 8- 10% fuel savings fuel injection gives, so
figure a normal 6 gph will be more like 5.5. With our tank it only makes
20-30 minutes difference in cruise time.  See the SDS website
http://www.sdsefi.com/.  The fuel map done on the RV-6 with a Subaru, which
is a notorious gas hog (I've flown two).  The O-320 conversion flies at 6.5
gph verses a normal 8 gph, when leaned, and an O-200 at about 4.85 verses
5.5 to 6 with the carb.  Not bad, so 10% is reasonable for a normally
aspirated engine.

  The nice thing about the turbo is it is inter-cooled, so more efficient.
No operational altitude restriction on the engine.  It has adjustable boost
so you can save your engine and fly what I called turbo normalized with just
a few inches of boost and the longevity of the engine will be much improved,
more like a 912 than a 914.  I also like the shorter muffler, which allows a
more esthetic exhaust pipe exit for the creative builder.  The alternator on
the rear makes maintenance of the belt a snap.  No prop removal, and any
Denso will work.  Like any other alternator, do put an over-voltage
protection device on it as it puts out 55 amps and if the internal regulator
goes out it can fry your electrics.  Jason even manufactures a mount ready
to bolt to the gear frame of the Europa (about two inches shorter because
his ring mount is slightly farther aft for the alternator) so the footprint
fits our cowl nearly perfectly.  EFI does require competent wiring skills.
Use good quality PIDG connectors and ensure proper strain relief.  One bad
ground and the system is dead.  Two fuel pumps is a must, and a backup
battery for one system may be useful.  Finally, there is the safety of
knowing the SDS electronics will retard the spark and fuel flow to prevent
over speed and or over boost.  If the waste gate sticks on my 914, it will
over boost and as others have found, blow a cylinder or two.  If my next
deal doesn't work out I will probably take the top off my 914 and put on
Jason's system and hook the vacuum dash pot to the existing turbo arm.

  We will have to wait for the Europa owners to get flying and see what the
actual fuel flows for our plane and prop combinations are.

  I just spent two days troubleshooting another 914 with problems.  Good
news is my DOS programming skills came back, and the electronic
troubleshooting program didn't tell me a thing about how to tweak the engine
back to working normal.  With the SDS EFI it works or it doesn't.  Once the
engine is mapped (which Jason's done) just check you have oil pressure, fuel
pressure, spark, and fire it up, it will run.

  Just my opinion.  But I'm biased.

  Bud

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: craig bastin
    To: europa-list@matronics.com
    Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 6:27 PM
    Subject: RE: Europa-List: 914 Fuel Injected Update & Opinion


    Just wondering if you got any fuel useage figures, and whether there is
any significant difference
    in cruise flight useage.
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of ALAN YERLY
      Sent: Wednesday, 13 May 2009 8:04 AM
      To: europa-list@matronics.com
      Subject: Re: Europa-List: 914 Fuel Injected Update & Opinion


      If you don't have an engine yet for your project, consider this:

      At Sun 'n Fun, I talked with Gunter Rund, an Auto Gyro owner, using
Jason Parker's fuel injected Rotax 914 with intercooler.  He is enthusiastic
about it's smooth operation over the entire range and throttle response.  He
has nearly 100 hours of trouble free operation so far.  These 914s use
military technology from the Predator Drone program, and Jason converts them
to fit the experimental market.  The engine footprint is virtually the same
as a stock 914 for tractor operations (turbo underneath) and pusher
operations (turbo on the top for bed mounting).  In the past, Jason's
engines required some skill and attention to detail that limited me from
being comfortable with the setup for just anyone to install.  Now that the
engine is in its fourth generation and is set up for user friendly
installation, it looks like a winner.

      My involvement, to be honest, has been to give advice on engine
mounting and footprint.  I insisted the engine must fit as close as possible
to a stock 914 setup.  I spent a number of hours with Jason over the last
two years making the engine fit the Europa and finally it is as close to
plug and play as you can get.
      He has gone to a fuel system similar to a Lycoming or Continental
engine. It has a fuel block on the top side of the engine with both the
supply and return lines flared for AN6 fittings.  Just install an AN fitting
on an Aeroequip hose with fire sleeve and the firewall forward is as safe as
you can make it.  Of course you must follow the instructions as your fuel
filters and fittings must hold up to 40 psi, so, no cheap fittings or
hardware shortcuts South of the pumps can be tolerated.  He's moved the
engine wiring to the bottom side of the manifolds and fuel rails, and
properly secured them to make the engine very easy to inspect and very neat
looking. The computer (or computers for redundancy) for the electronic fuel
injection should  be protected, although they are set up for cowl
installation (the SDS Fuel injection system is normally used under the hood
in racing) and all the sensor wiring is plug and play.  Each engine is run
by him and the fuel map setup programmed.  The SDS programming is a breeze
also, plus you can adjust mixture ratios on the fly based on your fuel
octane by a knob on the panel.  (Although this knob should have a resistance
lock on it to prevent inadvertent actuation by a grandson with fast hands.)

      He says he is wiling to sell the 914 turbocharged and intercooled
engines for $21000.  That's a bargain.

      Although I have spent time and money to help develop the idea, I do
not make sales commissions from his  engine sales, I just want to see the
idea become a reality because of the great success of the military version
of the 914, and selfishly, I plan to use one on my next project to give me
some better options for efficient operations at altitude.  I just introduced
him to the right people and added my inputs, as other manufacturers and
dealers have, in an effort to make his product ideal for the experimental
market.   Besides, tuning carbs and needing DOS computer programs to
maintain an engine today seems archaic.

        See his new website at:  http://www.extremeaircraftengines.com


      Bud Yerly
      Custom Flight Creations.


href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List";>http://www.matronhref
"http://forums.matronics.com";>http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution";>http://www.matronics.com/c


href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List";>http://www.matronhref
"http://forums.matronics.com";>http://forums.matronics.com
href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution";>http://www.matronics.com/c



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>