Brian wrote:
>
> Ira raises an obvious and simple solution that again a number of Europas
> have- You could simply use the standard factory fuel configuration but om
it
> the reurn flow transducer. The FS450 has a very simple K factor adjustmen
t
> routine that would compensate for the error caused by not measuring retur
n
> flow. The difference between the return flow at low and high power settin
gs
> is probably negligible. If you are worried about it you could always
> measure it during the fuel flow checks required before first flight.
>
Okay=2C I think I will do just that. I will modify the wiring harness to al
low for a second transducer=2C but install another tr. ONLY if it turns out
I need one. Saves a lot of money and hassle and should be completely safe.
Karl
>
> Hi All=2C
>
> I know this has been discussed before=2C but the present discussion seems
to
> discount the fact that the 912s and the 914 return fuel quantities are qu
ite
> different. The 914 has a continuous=2C significant return flow while the
912s
> has a negligible return flow. My suspicion is that the flow rate in a 912
s
> is below the range of accurate measurement of a 201b floscan.
>
> --------
> Ira N224XS
>
>
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=240878#240878
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> 06:30:00
>
>
===========
===========
===========
===========
>
>
>
|