Good comment Nigel,
I have installed all three but prefer the carbon fiber Advanced Aircraft
Electronics (AAE) antenna types because they are "no brainers".
Hook an AAE to your handheld and it is a great backup for anyone. Heck,
just tack with super glue in spots between the epoxy aft of the area
behind the bulkhead for a quick retrofit. Use it for your ELT also if
you want instead of rigging a ground plane.
I can hook my "Sporties SP200 to the AAE antenna and it is as good as
the Narco.
If you need to make an antenna, by all means get an VSWR meter and tune
it to make it perfect. It is only a few dollars but time and tuning is
spent also. Personally, the older I get, time is a precious commodity.
Bud
Custom Flight Creations
----- Original Message -----
From: nigel charles<mailto:nwcmc@tiscali.co.uk>
To: europa-list@matronics.com<mailto:europa-list@matronics.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:34 PM
Subject: RE: Europa-List: Comm Antenna installation
<nwcmc@tiscali.co.uk<mailto:nwcmc@tiscali.co.uk>>
I think the various comments made on this subject shows that the
installation is probably more important than the choice of product.
There have been many positive and negative comments about each type of
antenna. Quality of the connections and avoiding tight bends in the
cable are important considerations.
I am considering putting a second antenna into the fuselage to enable
my
handheld to be used as a backup radio. Handheld radios will work well
in
the aircraft provided they have a proper antenna. The short rubber
antennas give poor transmission and are useless for a touring flight
such as a crossing of the English Channel.
Nigel Charles
-----Original Message-----
From:
owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com<mailto:owner-europa-list-server@ma
tronics.com>
[mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com<mailto:ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com>
Sent: 22 January 2009 16:42
To: europa-list@matronics.com<mailto:europa-list@matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Europa-List: Comm Antenna installation
<ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com<mailto:ivor.phillips@ntlworld.com>>
Hi Bill
I have the normal Europa copper tape Di-pole on the stern post and a
Bob
Archer Just behind the D panel Port side, To be Honest the Copper tape
antenna works much better, Have read ATIS at over 70NM with a Xcom and
about 50NM with the Garmin SL30 using the Bob Archers,
regards
Ivor
---- William McClellan
<wilwood@earthlink.net<mailto:wilwood@earthlink.net>> wrote:
<wilwood@earthlink.net<mailto:wilwood@earthlink.net>>
>
> The amount of archived data on antennas is overwhelming and some of
it
more technical than I can follow. The volume of this data possibly
suggests the amount of not easily solved problems with antennas. I
thought I had come to an installation solution that would bypass most
if
not all the potential problems until I read that some are having trim
servo interference problems with the comm antenna. I had intended to
install the Archer "v" configuration antenna in the fin and a second
"s"
configuration comm antenna on the fuse side rear of the baggage
compartment. The Archer information says inside the fin is the ideal
place for a glass plane considering it needs to be placed in a
vertical
plane. My transponder antenna is to be on the rear fuse bottom side,
reasonably far away from the cockpit.
>
> Has anyone installed an Archer comm antenna in the fin without
having
to shield the trim servo and its wiring? I intend to follow Archer's
instructions using proper shielded cable and also staying as far as
possible from other vertical metal objects and mindful of establishing
adequate grounding for each component.
>
> As I am trying to bypass the complexities of antenna installation
and
theory, any input/help would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Bill McClellan
> 164XS
>
>
>
>
>
>
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/>
1/22/2009 7:08 AM
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List<http://www.matronics.com/N
avigator?Europa-List>
http://www.matronics.com/contribution<http://www.matronics.com/contributi
on>
|