Ronald J. Parigoris wrote:
> He said that the alternator has some sort of seperate winding or redundency
> (?)
> to keep a fuel pump going in the event the battery and primary windings in
> alternator failed.
>
> Is this true or false?
>
> He said Rotax thought the problem through quite well?
The manual diagrams 8 series connected coils. Suppose they could have
paralleled a pair of 4 coils, but I'm guessing that won't give you the
desired output even with necessarily much bigger coils.
It should be something which can be made to work when unearthed in an
archeological dig a thousand years from now. However, the big stator
recall, though believe the ignition part of it, was just a stupid wire
or two failing!
Best,
Fred F.
|