europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Conversions pt or qt to cc

Subject: Re: Conversions pt or qt to cc
From: Eddie and Sue Lindsay <elindsay@zianet.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 20:22:35
Eileen: Please throw him back out in the shop and lock the door! I just NEW
this would stir the pot! Hey, guy, how the heck are you? Will drop you a
note off-line tomorrow. Best to you both...however warped and misguided you
might be. :-) -Ed-

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve & Eileen Genotte" <gopack@sprintmail.com>
Subject: Re: Conversions pt or qt to cc


> Sorry, Colonel.  After comparing the two systems for over 20 years, I'd
> go metric in a heartbeat, but I'm forced to put up with the insanity of
> pounds, pints, and pecks.
>
> Grrr.
>
> Steve G.
>
> Eddie and Sue Lindsay wrote:
> >
> > Not ALL of us here in The Colonies are enthusiastic about the idea. I
> > certainly am not, and would bet I have some company out there in
Email-land.
> > (I think I'm really going to regret this. What the heck.) -Ed Lindsay,
etc.-
> > P.S. Please be kind?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rowland & Wilma Carson" <rowil@clara.net>
> > Subject: RE: Conversions pt or qt to cc
> >
> > >
> > > >It sure would be nice if the clowns in Congress did something useful
like
> > > >mandate SI units (that's metric to you non-technical types) for the
US.
> > >
> > > Glad to hear there are some folk in the colonies with the right idea.
> > > It'd be nice if the British government could get back its nerve (lost
> > > sometime in the 1970s) to get us over here metricated properly, too!
> > > The only thing worse than not doing a job at all is to stop doing it
> > > half-way through and tell the customer "Oh well, it's your problem
> > > now!"
> > >
> > > regards
> > >
> > > Rowland
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________________
> > >            ... that's Rowland with a 'w' ...
> > >
> >
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>