I possess new classic port and starboard radiators; not for sale but for when my
old ones fail. PM me if interested.
BUT I wholeheartedly agree with the assertion that fitting the classic cowls
around
the 912 series with associated short engine bearer frame is not the cleverest
idea. I recently replaced my 80hp engine with 100hp and heaven help me if
ever I need to replace the starter motor.
There isn't room to allow fitting of the longer higher torque starter motor
because
the frame gets in the way. To replace the starter, I would need to lift out
the entire engine and then remove the bearer frame from the engine. That is
utterly HELLISH! My frame isn't true and needs persuading.
The longer starter is a really good idea, to help overcome the higher
compression
and prevent kick-backs. Also the latest CDI units with very retarded spark
for the first few seconds are intended for the same purpose.
Fortunately the most helpful and experienced Kevin Dilks of Special Aviation
Services
suggested that I employ a separate starter button to get past the initial
inertia and build momentum for a couple of seconds before turning on the
ignition.
It works a treat!
However, I digress. I agree that the classic cowling and spinner give a much
sexier
line to the airframe, compared with the snub-nosed XS look. So if you insist
on a sleeker image and want to risk the space limitations of the original
design, then I'm willing to consider helping in some way.
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=428467#428467
|