Hi all,
I'd like to second John's comments here. My experience with the EIS fuel
flow option on my 914 has been excellent (2 sensors were required for a
914), but the thing is nuts on everytime.
The EIS is the most useful box in my panel, I can't say enough about it.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
[mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com]On Behalf Of John & Paddy
Wigney
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 9:28 AM
Subject: PROBABLE SPAM> Europa-List: Re: Fuel flow transducer
<johnwigney@alltel.net>
Hi Peter,
If you still have the flexibility to make this choice for your panel, my
recommendation is to use a Grand Rapids EIS 2004 engine monitor with the
fuel flow option which is another USD375.00. See
http://www.grtavionics.com/model_2004.htm The EIS is one of the best
instruments in my panel. Rock solid performance and reliability. The fuel
flow totaliser is accurate to within 0.1 gallons after calibration which
makes for great peace of mind on fuel remaining and the endurance is
calculated for you. I have also found that the EIS total engine time
recorder is very reliable. After 500 + hours, it is within a few decimals of
my Hobbs meter reading. Next time around, I would not bother with a Hobbs.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Cheers, John
N262WF, mono XS, 912S
Mooresville, North Carolina
_-
_-
_-
_-
_-
_-
|