Jos, please,
my propeller is Woodcomp SR 2000.
For the control of this propeller I have two sub-asemblies.
1/ Constant speed unit CSU
2/ "Manual" unit MU
For the switching from CSU to MU I have the switch there.
When the switch is in MU position, the CSU unit is fully disconnected.
The whole control I have connected only on one circuit breaker (MU, CSU
and motor in propeller)
When I shuld have the same problem with CSU after Take off as you, my
duty would be:
1/ to switch from CSU to MU
2/ to switch the circuit breaker to ON position again
3/ to control the propeller with help of MU (of course, when the circuit
breaker would hold in ON position-the problem would be then really in
CSU)
I am reading the accident report from Austria and I see there nothing
about, if you did the switching from CSU to MU or did not.
Please, could you clear it?
Thank you very much.
Stanislav
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "josok" <josok-e@ukolo.fi>
> To: <europa-list@matronics.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 8:47 PM
> Subject: Europa-List: Finally: The accident report
> Wels, 22.08.2008, Wels
> Austria
>
> > >
> > Posted here:
> > http://www.europaowners.org/viewtopic.php?p=24760#24760
> > > Copied from faxes and in German, sorry. If somebody
> > interested and German
> > > speaking would be so kind to do a summary in English?
> > >
> > For me the most intriguing statement, in my own translation:
> > "Based on the
> > > position of the adjustment rings on the propeller
> > blade A, it could be
> > > established, with help of the manufacturer respectively
> > it's
> > > documentation, that the blade angle at the time of
> > the crash was at
> > > minimum pitch, that is 19 degree. "
> >
> > Now my question to the forum is: Should the plane
> > not be flyable with that
> > > pitch on the prop, taking in account that the speed
> > had allready dropped
> > > to 50 knots?
> > Kind Regards,
> > Jos Okhuijsen
|