Hi Ira,
Sorry, no assumption. Somebody said that quality of inspection was guaranteed
because
it was done according to a list of known problem areas. On the question
were that list and it's (statistical) results is available no real answer pops
up, and in other postings that check list is played down to some known, factory
followed up, items.
Conventional? Is that non-destructive? testing can be very effective if you know
where to look, eventually with the aid of a bore-scope or ultra sound Simple
tapping also reveals a lot. But it all boils down to in depth knowledge of what
you are looking for.
In this stage i tend to give up. Everything is just fine. There are no problems
because planes are inspected perfectly according to a non-existing list.
Whatever
happens thereafter has nothing to do with the perfect system. End of thread
for me.
Regards,
Jos Okhuijsen
Visit - www.EuropaOwners.org
|