I was always given to believe that RF from transponders was fairly potent
stuff but im no expert and I dont know how it compares to mobile phones or
comms radios.
I guess it depends on your definition of continuously but for my money a few
milliseconds of transmission every 2 seconds adds up to a significant amount
of RF energy. Its not continuous but must add up to quite a bit. Comms
transmission on the other hand would amount to a couple of minutes per hour
for most of us.
But if you say transponder antennas are relatively safe then I guess you
know what you are talking about. Fortunately no amount of RF is going to
affect me in the parenting department - I had the snip 30 years ago ! - and
the grand children are someone elses responsibility.
Carl Pattinson
G-LABS
----- Original Message -----
From: "europa flugzeug fabrik" <n3eu@oh.rr.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: Europa-List:Transponders
> <n3eu@oh.rr.com>
>
>
> carl@flyers.freeserve. wrote:
>> ...(ie: move it closer to the cockpit) - unless you are planning to have
>> kids !!!!!
>>
>> Remember that unlike a comms radio a transponder transmits continuously
>> so the exposure to radiation is greater.
>
> No, it does not transmit continuously, but only bursts of a few
> milliseconds (at partial duty cycle) only when our reply lamp blinks in
> response to an ATC radar sweep. If we do the math on RF exposure, we
> absorb more RF energy from a cell phone than a transponder antenna a few
> feet away.
>
> Fred F.
>
>
> Read this topic online here:
>
> http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=123903#123903
>
>
>
|