europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Europa-List: Mod 72 question

Subject: Re: Europa-List: Mod 72 question
From: Mike Parkin <mikenjulie.parkin@btopenworld.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:40:35
Bob, 

This is why we are able to operate our aircraft so cheaply.  If you want 
certificates and batch numbers,  buy a certified aircraft and pay for 
your annual and C of A.  Also you would not be allowed to perform your 
own maintenance.  If you are not happy with the certified/experimental 
world, then do not ruin it for those of us that are.

regards,

Mike
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: R.C.Harrison 
  To: europa-list@matronics.com 
  Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:34 AM
  Subject: RE: Europa-List: Mod 72 question


  Hi! Tom

   This is now two photo's of failed items I've seen which, IMHO I have 
to agree 100% with you every indication of fatigue is there. My training 
is likely "old Hat" particularly considering modern alloy extruded tube 
but  I wonder what traceability exists of annealing/stress relieving :-

   

  a)  done to these and all frames ? (do certificates exist and where?)

  b) what such heat treatment is actually called up on the metals and 
complex joints in question?

  c) what investigation has been undertaken with Rockwell Hardness tests 
over the whole of the failed frames and in particular close to the 
failure?

   

  This is all shutting the gate after the horse has bolted but in the 
total shape of things we need to know along with the question will new 
ones be produced with up rated tubes and will they have an appropriately 
designed heat treatment with a certificate?

  NB I do have evidence that my nose leg has been "normalised".

   

  Regards

  Bob Harrison. G-PTAG

   

   

   

  Robt.C.Harrison

   

  -----Original Message-----
  From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com 
[mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Tom 
Friedland
  Sent: 20 January 2007 04:52
  To: europa-list@matronics.com
  Subject: Re: Europa-List: Mod 72 question

   

  Hi Graham

   

  I doubt that you will get an answer what caused the break.  It looks 
to be that it was most likely a tension break with perhaps some fatigue 
factor.  The upper tubes will have tension in the upper parts and that 
will be increased by the thrust.  There also could be some problem with 
non annealed brittleness from the closeness of the weld. 

   

  The lower tubes should be ok as they have tension stress from weight 
bearing but that is cancelled by compression.

   

  But then what do I know.  My engineering studies were 50 years ago!  
Now I am just a dumb doc.

   

  Tom

   

  On 1/19/07, Graham Singleton <grahamsingleton@btinternet.com> wrote: 

grahamsingleton@btinternet.com>

  Roger
  what type of failure was it, bending, shear or fatigue?
  Graham

  Roger Bull wrote:

  >O.K. Bob, you woke me up!
  >
  >
  >Rob Housman's answer is on the ball.  Using Redux would necessitate 

            - The Europa-List Email Forum -   --> 
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List              - NEW 
MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -   --> http://forums.matronics.com 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----


20/01/2007 10:24


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>