>I look with interest at all of the options, but everytime, the Rotax comes
>back on top.
>I have no ties with Rotax, just in case some of you think that may be the
>case. It just saddens me to see you guys [ and gals] put your money and
>time into
>
>something that may dissapoint you later[ and by then, you wouldn't admit it
>anyway ?]
>Stuff a Rotax on the front, [work at your day job a few hours longer each
>week to pay for it, if you have to], and go fly with what was intended.
>Cheers,
>Nev.
So do I
I agree with Nev, the main point is the airplane was designed for optimum
performance with the Rotax, it just isn't possible to improve on it without
redesigning the whole aircraft. It also is NOT possible to optimise engine
performance without liquid cooling.
Graham
--
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
|