europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: OBAM Defined

Subject: Re: OBAM Defined
From: hedley brown <hedley@hedleybrown.flyer.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 20:43:04
How nice to read an aeronautical letter that is free of the possessive "its"
spelt as if it were an abbreviation of 'it is'; free of nouns used as
adjectives and of split infinitives. Remember the ode to 'Tires and Tyres'?
--h--- Original Message -----
From: Fergkyle <ve3lvo@rac.ca>
Subject: Re: OBAM Defined


> Dear Eddie and Sue:
>             I quite agree that there should be a term which defines the
care
> and love that goes into an endeavour like building an aircraft. ....and
> perhaps OBAM is it. But it's foundation is built on ignorance. Ignorance
of
> the language in which it is couched - English.
>             One of its great qualities is the richness brought to it by
> other languages - the Norse, the Celts, the Romans and so forth. The use
of
> the words comes from their ancestry. Thus most of our family connections
are
> basically Norse, and the bulk is handed down from the early conquerors -
> Latin. To be ignorant of the source is to lose the meaning by misspelling
it
> or mispronouncing it - writing and speaking.
>             Sorry for the diatribe, but I take great pride in being an
> amateur - a lover of the job. I am an amateur radio licensee, not some
paid
> flunky who pretends to call himself a "professional", but a true
> professional - one who professes publicly to live to the highest personal
> standards he/she can attain - without taking money for it. That's an
> amateur.
>             A professional is not someone who gets paid for what he/she
> does, but one who professes to do his/her best. Anyone who does not
profess
> publicly is a 'commercial' - thus there are very few professionals in
sport.
> They are either amateur or commercial, nothing more. One hears in the
> advertising claptrap of 'professional tools', professional ballplayers,
> professional this and professional that. Hawkers' hooey.
>             How many amateurs satellites have been orbitted? The 40th is
up
> there now - is that amateurish? You bet your bottom dollar it is!
>             So call it what you want, but be aware that ignoring the
history
> of language is destroying it. Let's not have any more "Honey I shrunk the
> kids", deeeepo, leeesure, or newspaper rout. No more of the giant's labor,
> vigor or odor. If it must change, make it take more than one stupid
> generation to occur.
> Evolution not revolution. I realise I'm putting Bill Gates and his Spelch
> Ekker out of coin, but then that's only commercial.
>             I'm finished now.
> Happy landings
> Ferg
> A064
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Eddie and Sue Lindsay <elindsay@zianet.com>
> Subject: OBAM Defined
>
>
> > Thought this might be of interest. - Ed Lindsay -
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Robert L. Nuckolls, III" <nuckolls@aeroelectric.com>
> > Subject: Re: AeroElectric-List at Matronics
> > >
> > >      OBAM is the seed of an idea that I thought I'd plant and see what
> > >      happens. For years, we've been pretty proud of "amateur built" or
> > >      "home built" as terms to describe our craft. Problem is,  if you
> use
> > >      these terms in conversation with the average person on t he
street
> > >      you get a response that is less than positive.
> > >
> > >      "You mean these airplanes are built in somebody's house?" or
> > >      "My gawd, I'd never set foot in an airplane built by an AMATEUR."
> > >
> > >      Using the word "experimental" isn't any better.   So how about
> > >      Owner Built and Maintained aircraft?  When amateur built aviation
> > >      was in its infancy, each builder was pretty much on his own.
Yeah,
> > >      there was Sport Aviation and yeah, an occasional mechanic
> > >      working in the certified world might drop by to help out . . .
> > >      but by-in-large, each completed airplane was a solitary effort.
> > >
> > >      Today,  with kit offerings joining with a huge and growing
> > >      infrastructure of builder communications on the 'Net, I'll
suggest
> > >      that our efforts are head and shoulders taller than "amateur".
> > >      A builder may be working on his first and perhaps only
construction
> > >      project but the support structure makes his endeavor anything
> > >      but amateurish.
> > >
> > >      So how about it folks?  This is a sort of pull yourself up by the
> > >      bootstraps effort.  I am reminded of  good advice handed down
> > >      by many who would mentor somebody up in the knowledge and
> > >      skills of their particular specialty. "Son, if you want to be a
> > _________,"
> > >      then then the FIRST thing you have to do is look, talk, and act
> like
> > >      you ARE a __________."   In our case, we fill in the blanks with
> > >      the phrase, "builder of the world's finest single engine
> airplanes."
> > >
> > >
> > >      Bob . . .
> > >      --------------------------------------------------
> > >      ( "Imagination is more important than knowledge. )
> > >      ( It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal )
> > >      ( education"                  Albert Einstein    )
> > >      --------------------------------------------------
> > >                http://www.aeroelectric.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>