europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

LIVING aircraft batteries . . . (was 14 vs. 28v)

Subject: LIVING aircraft batteries . . . (was 14 vs. 28v)
From: Robert L. Nuckolls III <nuckolls@aeroelectric.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:20:42

>Twice in the last 20 years I have been stuck with a 
>dead battery.  The first time happened at a middle-of-nowhere . . .
> <snip>  . . . .Because I was in airplanes with 14 volt systems, 
>their vehicles were able to provide jump starts which got me 
>home . . . A 28 volt airplane has far fewer rescue options.


  May I suggest that over half of all s.e. airplanes
  flying today departed with a FAILED battery? We
  tend to treat batteries in our airplanes like
  batteries in our cars . . . it gets replaced when
  it fails to crank the engine for perhaps the
  4th or 5th time?

  This means that the battery has been useless as
  a source of backup energy for perhaps years before it
  finally gets replaced. RG batteries are going to
  make this situation worse, they maintain a lower
  internal resistance than their wet and gel cousins.
  They'll still get an engine started even futher 
  down the slide toward the recycle bin.

  Please learn and observe some peventative maintenance
  techniques almost unheard of in certified aviation.
  KNOW (by measurement) or BE SURE (by periodic
  replacement) or DON'T CARE (with dual alternators)
  that the battery is capable of getting you home in 
  the situations which you fly.

  You can find a lot of mechanics out there that curse
  batteries for their various faults but very few
  that understand how to live with them.


       Bob . . .

                       ////
                      (o o)
       <  Independence Kansas: the     >
       <  Jurassic Park of aviation.   >
       <  Your source for brand new    >
       <  40 year old airplanes.       >
          http://www.aeroelectric.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • LIVING aircraft batteries . . . (was 14 vs. 28v), Robert L . Nuckolls III <=