europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Where goes the energy now?

Subject: Where goes the energy now?
From: Graham Clarke <gemin@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 21:33:02
This mail has been composed after consultation with a number of builders 
who have been waiting in vain for some days to see reactions to the "Main 
Gear" letter, mod no. ??. Is it shock, resignation, or apathy ? The 
mods.in this area have been getting more severe each time at significant 
expense to the factory and the builders in terms of both effort and cash. 
In the beginning the bungy block, (a re-usable energy absorber) seemed 
like a good idea until it turned out that in returning the energy, it 
bounced the aircraft (quickie-wise) back into the air. Is this why it has 
never be used before ? Although I have driven an American car with piston 
mounted bumpers, modern car protection is based on crumple zones as near 
the accident as possible, not on springy systems. Introduction of stops 
increases the load transfer when they are reached, and a hydraulic damper 
(returning the energy progressively) was apparenty is not sufficiently 
large in the space available to do the job. The various mods to the frame 
and its stops have resulted in isolated case(s) of buckling which means 
we have an inbuilt crumple zone which might be a bit too weak.  
Unfortunately in the absence of recorded data from these instances, the 
actual load to which it has been subjected is not known.  Quite rightly 
the factory set out to remove this doubt with drop tests, which seem to 
have shown that it has to be a very abnormal load to damage the frame, 
but nevertheless have offered more strengthing to prevent it. But is this 
the correct thing to do ? Leaving aside the difficulty and/or expense and 
delay of doing the latest mod. to complete or near-completer aircraft, it 
will certainly  increase the possibility of passing more load beyond the 
frame into the tunnel/fuselage. The tests carried out with the frame 
only, cannot tell us where the buck(le) stops now. So please can the 
factory repeat this test with at least a dummy tunnel and bulkhead in 
place if not a real fuselage, before we do this mod. only to find that 
the next time the fuselage collapses. If a problem is then found, a 
number of suggestions are available, such as removing the block assembly 
and replacing it with two or more hydraulic dampers as used by many 
conventional undercarriages, motor cycle forks etc.

gemin



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>