europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Thanks

Subject: Re: Thanks
From: Dirk Rackley <vortecs@teleport.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 14:52:56
On Tue, 8 Aug 1995, Steven A Eberhart wrote:

> On Tue, 8 Aug 1995, Marc LeFevre wrote:
> 
> > Thanks to those of you who responded to my recent posting.  This is
> > a very useful way of carrying on the discussions that one needs in
> > making a decision as to what plane to build.
> > 
> [snip] 
> > I'd also like to ask those of you that are well along in your kits to
> > estimate about how much of the overall build time will be filling and
> > sanding the wing and tail surfaces.  The tedium of that process could
> > be the thing that makes me become a tin bender rather than an expoxy
> > slosher.
> 
> Marc,
> 
> The amount of time needed to finish the wing and stabilizer are very 
> disproportionate to the amount of work necessary for the remainder of the 
> plane IM(not so)HO.  I don't have a plane under construction, planing on 
> starting this winter but I am getting ready to build several test 
> horizontal stabilizer sections to work out the details of vacuum baging 
> the wings and tail.  Vacuum bagging the assemblies should save close to 
> half of the total building time.  I havn't used the procedure on a full 
> size plane but I have been using FG, carbon fiber and kevlar on radio 
> control model airplanes for a while now.  R/C modelers have been vacuum 
> bagging foam wings for quite some time now with very good results.
> 
> I am hot wire cutting the cores from blue insulation foam.  I have 
> attempted to copy the plan form, airfoil and cross section of the horiz. 
> stabilizer as closely as I can with out actual drawings or templates from 
> Ivan.  I will advise all on the mail group of the successes or failures 
> of this venture.
> 
> Just got off of the phone with Bob Berube from the Lakeland office and he 
> is sending additional info to assist in me being able to match the 
> production stab. with my test panels.  They are in the process of 
> building a demonstrator using the wet layup method.  Hope to be able to 
> compare the wet layup vis-a-vis vacuum bagging.
> 
> Steve
> 

If you can get me the airfoil designator (i.e. 65012) used on the tail we 
could generate either a coordinate listing (We have the NASA airfoil 
generator program for most airfoils) or also plot full sized templates.


   |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|--------------------------->>>>>>>>>!!
   |  Vortecs Aircraft    Vancouver WA                    ---{*}---        |



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>