> On the 2 PV50s that I have have had experience with, neither have provided
> sufficient adjustment. In fact, they were dispatched from the factory with
> the limit switches set to completely unrealistic positions. But hell, they
> are French, so perhaps that is to be expected.
>
> Overall, I do not believe that the Arplast is a bad product. Its weakest
> point is the pitch motor which has a poor track record (they tend to burn
> out rather too easily (that's another story)). Also, their wiring could be
> better. To compensate, the hub is OK and the blades are very good indeed.
> I
> would still choose an Arplast instead of an Airmaster any day.
>
You have never owned an Airmaster???? - But you would still choose an
Arplast over an Airmaster -----the mind boggles.
MP
|