Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*radios\s+etc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*radios\s+etc\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. radios etc (score: 1): Author: Paul Stewart <pauld.stewart@virgin.net>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 17:33:18; Just starting to think about planning a panel and have found the recent thread concerning ebgine instruments very useful. Along the same lines, are there any opinions out there (can't believe there a; /europa_forum//html/europa-list/2001-05/msg00065.html (7,907 bytes)
2. RE: radios etc (score: 1): Author: Bob.Harrison <ptag.dev@ukonline.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 21:42:39; Hi! Paul. I am very limited in radio knowledge, but I sure wish I hadn't bought a set that has auto squelch control. I have tried everything recommended to stop the incoming signal getting shut down; /europa_forum//html/europa-list/2001-05/msg00066.html (9,130 bytes)
3. RE: radios etc (score: 1): Author: Steve Hagar <hagargs@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 19:57:33; Paul: I talked to the Microair guy at Sun and Fun about the 4 watt issue. He related that they are planning on introducing a new unit at Oshkosh. I believe he said that the new unit will have a varia; /europa_forum//html/europa-list/2001-05/msg00069.html (9,059 bytes)
4. Re: radios etc (score: 1): Author: Fred Fillinger <fillinger@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 22:44:21; The Microair was reviewed very favorably in Kitplanes magazine by Jim Weir (www.rst-engr.com). His view is that 4 watts (he measured it at 4.3) is more than adequate, but that's under ideal line-of-s; /europa_forum//html/europa-list/2001-05/msg00070.html (8,668 bytes)
5. Re: radios etc (score: 1): Author: Fred Fillinger <fillinger@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 22:45:10; Bob, my brain's auto-squelch may be fritzed, but I'm not clear on the symptom. Is interference breaking squelch? Or is received signal cutting in and out? Especially if the latter, there may be an in; /europa_forum//html/europa-list/2001-05/msg00071.html (8,603 bytes)
6. Re: radios etc (score: 1): Author: Paul & Liz Atkinson <paulliz@cix.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 22:45:10; Paul I have a Microair though haven't used it in anger yet. Technically I cant help much, but both Bob Nuckolls and Jim Wier speak very highly of it which is good enough for me. Bob is selling it wit; /europa_forum//html/europa-list/2001-05/msg00072.html (9,037 bytes)
7. Re: radios etc (score: 1): Author: Tom & Cathy Friedland <tfriedland@home.com>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 09:28:37; Paul When I flew in the US Army aircraft in the '60s, our L-19s had a radio that put out 1/8th of a watt. They worked great at more than line of sight distances! I purchased a Microaire 760 through a; /europa_forum//html/europa-list/2001-05/msg00074.html (9,994 bytes)
8. Re: radios etc (score: 1): Author: Fred Fillinger <fillinger@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 12:48:06; That's an odd design feature. If it's capable of 10W, why a switched 5W option? 10W is pushing the limit of, if not exceeding, what you can cleanly pump into a 50-ohm load with 13.75V. Unless the des; /europa_forum//html/europa-list/2001-05/msg00075.html (8,518 bytes)
9. radios etc (score: 1): Author: Nigel Charles <72016.3721@compuserve.com>; Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 09:00:00; Message text written by "Paul Stewart" there any opinions out there (can't believe there aren't) about suitable VHF equipment. < The Apollo SL40 is a big step forward compared to the equivalent King/; /europa_forum//html/europa-list/2001-05/msg00095.html (7,889 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]